On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:38:53PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:07:48PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > So now we have 3 options: > > > > a) Apply these patches as-is. > > b) Fix XFS to both return the actual bytes_deduped and cap the length > > for the EOF case. Do the same for Btrfs. > > c) Make XFS consistent with the existing Btrfs behavior. > > > > I'm starting to lean towards option c after writing this cover letter, > > but I might as well send these out and get a second opinion. > > I agree - btrfs was there first, and there is no fatal flaw in the ABI, > so let's adjust XFS to it.
Ok. I'll send in a fix for generic/182, a patch to fix XFS, and I'll roll the same fix into the ocfs2 patches before the next submission. --D > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
