People who don't frequent IRC nor the mailing list tend to believe RAID 5/6
are stable; this leads to data loss. Thus, let's do warn them.
At this point, I think fiery letters that won't be missed are warranted.
Kernel 4.9 and its -progs will be a part of LTS of multiple distributions,
so leaving experimental features without a warning is inappropriate.
Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl>
---
cmds-balance.c | 2 ++
mkfs.c | 2 ++
utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
utils.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cmds-balance.c b/cmds-balance.c
index f17345e..0967162 100644
--- a/cmds-balance.c
+++ b/cmds-balance.c
@@ -48,8 +48,10 @@ static int parse_one_profile(const char *profile, u64 *flags)
} else if (!strcmp(profile, "raid10")) {
*flags |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10;
} else if (!strcmp(profile, "raid5")) {
+ print_raid56_warning();
*flags |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5;
} else if (!strcmp(profile, "raid6")) {
+ print_raid56_warning();
*flags |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6;
} else if (!strcmp(profile, "dup")) {
*flags |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP;
diff --git a/mkfs.c b/mkfs.c
index e501a93..8d460b7 100644
--- a/mkfs.c
+++ b/mkfs.c
@@ -378,8 +378,10 @@ static u64 parse_profile(const char *s)
} else if (strcasecmp(s, "raid1") == 0) {
return BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1;
} else if (strcasecmp(s, "raid5") == 0) {
+ print_raid56_warning();
return BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5;
} else if (strcasecmp(s, "raid6") == 0) {
+ print_raid56_warning();
return BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6;
} else if (strcasecmp(s, "raid10") == 0) {
return BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10;
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 69b580a..b9e44c2 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -4204,6 +4204,52 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+#define NFL 5
+#define CYCLE (NFL * 2 - 2)
+/* force text-on-black even if reversed */
+#define BG "\e[0;40;"
+static const char *fire_levels[NFL] =
+{ BG"1;30m", BG"31m", BG"1;31m", BG"1;33m", BG"1;37m", };
+#undef BG
+
+/* If this ever gets localized, we'll need to split by characters not bytes. */
+static void text_on_fire(const char *str)
+{
+ int s = 0, sl, chunks, len = strlen(str);
+
+ /* no colors if our output is redirected */
+ if (!isatty(fileno(stderr)))
+ return (void)fputs(str, stderr);
+
+ /* repeat the scheme if too long, try 2-3 letters per level */
+ chunks = (len / CYCLE / 3 + 1) * CYCLE + 1;
+ for (int ch = 0; ch < chunks; ++ch) {
+ int lev = ch % CYCLE;
+ fputs(fire_levels[(lev < NFL) ? lev : CYCLE - lev],
+ stderr);
+ sl = len * (ch + 1) / chunks;
+ for (; s < sl; ++s)
+ fputc(*str++, stderr);
+ }
+ fputs("\e[0m", stderr); /* reset color */
+}
+#undef NFL
+#undef CYCLE
+
+void print_raid56_warning(void)
+{
+ static int given = 0;
+ if (given)
+ return;
+ given = 1;
+
+ fprintf(stderr,
+"WARNING: btrfs RAID5 and 6 are still experimental, suffering from serious\n"
+"problems. Thus, you are advised not to continue unless you know what
you're\n"
+"doing. In all cases, do keep up-to-date backups!\n");
+ text_on_fire("Don't use RAID5/6 for anything important!\n");
+}
+
void init_rand_seed(u64 seed)
{
int i;
diff --git a/utils.h b/utils.h
index 366ca29..00a253a 100644
--- a/utils.h
+++ b/utils.h
@@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ static inline int __error_on(int condition, const char
*fmt, ...)
return 1;
}
+void print_raid56_warning(void);
+
/* Pseudo random number generator wrappers */
u32 rand_u32(void);
--
2.10.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
