The old code is using rescan to verify the number. It will never hurt to add extra qgroup verification using btrfsck.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> --- tests/btrfs/022 | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/btrfs/022 b/tests/btrfs/022 index 56d4f3d..d1ac921 100755 --- a/tests/btrfs/022 +++ b/tests/btrfs/022 @@ -125,20 +125,25 @@ _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mount _basic_test _scratch_unmount +_btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mount _rescan_test _scratch_unmount +_btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mount _limit_test_exceed _scratch_unmount +_btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mount _limit_test_noexceed +_scratch_unmount +_btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup # success, all done echo "Silence is golden" -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
