Hi, this patch lacks basic formatting requirements, this has been extensively documented eg. here https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Developer's_FAQ .
Besides the formalities, I'm missing what's the change rationale. It deals with a strange case when the xattr name length is 0, which is unexpected and should not be handled silently. Next I'm not sure if bailing out of the function is right, there are more items to process. Best if we could skip the damaged ones but still continue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
