On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:50:34AM -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> On 12/5/16 10:29 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 12:07:30AM -0500, je...@suse.com wrote:
> >> -static inline u64 btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(struct btrfs_root *root,
> >> +static inline u64 btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> >> *fs_info,
> >>                                             unsigned num_items)
> >>  {
> >> -  return root->fs_info->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * 2 * num_items;
> >> +  return fs_info->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * 2 * num_items;
> > 
> > Is there a missing patch that moves 'nodesize' to fs_info? The patch has
> > a minor conflict in the original line where it's just 'root->nodesize',
> > but thre are many compilation faiures due to lack of fs_info::nodesize.
> 
> Yeah, it looks like the list dropped it.  It shows up in the thread
> posted to me.
> 
> I've pushed the series as the for-4.10/misc-4.10 branch in
> my repo at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeffm/linux-btrfs.git
> 
> It also contains the fix Omar suggested in his review.

Thanks, added to 4.10 queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to