On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 05:47:38PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 09:00:36AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > Hi, please fetch the following branch for next branch:
> > https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git fujitsu_for_next
> > 
> > This branch contains most of Fujitsu unmerged patches for for-next branch.
> > 
> > Latest David's for-next-20161219 branch can cause kernel panic so I don't
> > use it as base, but v4.10-rc1.
> 
> The for-next branch will be reassembled again as we're past rc1 now.
> 
> > I ran the full xfstests test cases, with both default mount options and
> > compress=lzo options.
> > Fixes are working and no new regression.
> > 
> > So I thing it should be good enough to act as a base for for-next branch.
> > 
> > This big patch set contains the following fixes:
> > 
> > 1) Wang's fixes for compression ENOSPC
> 
> AFAIK, the patches have been reviewed only partially and used to be part
> of for-next until the merge conflicts became unbearable. Patches
> touching space handling need review before merging and at least some
> sort of ack in case of for-next.

The 3 patches added to for-next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to