On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 11:10 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > In fact, the result without patches is not really needed for current > stage. > > Feel free to skip them until the patched ones passed. > Which should save you some time.
Well the idea is, that if I do further writes in the meantime (by adding new backup data), then things in the fs could change (I blindly assume) in such a way, that the false positive isn't triggered any more - not because a patch would finally have it fixed, but simply because things on the fs changed... That's why I repeated it always so far - just to see that the issues would be still there. > Would you please try lowmem_tests branch of my repo? > > That branch contains a special debug output for the case you > encountered, which should help to debug the case. > pecial debug output for the case you encountered, which Sure, tomorrow. Best wishes, Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
