On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:36:48AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Given that we aren't validating aio_flags in older kernels we can't > just add this flag as it will be a no-op in older kernels. I think > we will have to add IOCB_CMD_PREADV2/IOCB_CMD_WRITEV2 opcodes that > properly validate all reserved fields or flags first. > > Once we do that I'd really prefer to use the same flags values > as preadv2/pwritev2 so that we'll only need one set of flags over > sync/async read/write ops.
I just took another look and we do verify that aio_reserved1/aio_reserved2 must be zero. So I think we can just stick RWF_* into aio_reserved1 and fix that problem that way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
