On 03/09/2017 09:34 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Introduce a new function, btrfs_check_rw_degradable(), to check if all
chunks in btrfs is OK for degraded rw mount.

It provides the new basis for accurate btrfs mount/remount and even
runtime degraded mount check other than old one-size-fit-all method.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Austin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferro...@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl>
Tested-by: Dmitrii Tcvetkov <demfl...@demfloro.ru>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 73d56eef5e60..83613955e3c2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6765,6 +6765,61 @@ int btrfs_read_sys_array(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
        return -EIO;
 }

+/*
+ * Check if all chunks in the fs is OK for read-write degraded mount
+ *
+ * Return true if the fs is OK to be mounted degraded read-write
+ * Return false if the fs is not OK to be mounted degraded
+ */
+bool btrfs_check_rw_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
+       struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
+       struct extent_map *em;
+       u64 next_start = 0;
+       bool ret = true;
+
+       read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+       em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, 0, (u64)-1);
+       read_unlock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+       /* No chunk at all? Return false anyway */
+       if (!em) {
+               ret = false;
+               goto out;
+       }
+       while (em) {
+               struct map_lookup *map;
+               int missing = 0;
+               int max_tolerated;
+               int i;
+
+               map = (struct map_lookup *) em->bdev;


   any idea why not   map = em->map_lookup;  here?

Thanks, Anand


+               max_tolerated =
+                       btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
+                                       map->type);
+               for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
+                       if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing)
+                               missing++;
+               }
+               if (missing > max_tolerated) {
+                       ret = false;
+                       btrfs_warn(fs_info,
+       "chunk %llu missing %d devices, max tolerance is %d for writeble mount",
+                                  em->start, missing, max_tolerated);
+                       free_extent_map(em);
+                       goto out;
+               }
+               next_start = extent_map_end(em);
+               free_extent_map(em);
+
+               read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+               em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, next_start,
+                                          (u64)(-1) - next_start);
+               read_unlock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+       }
+out:
+       return ret;
+}
+
 int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 {
        struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->chunk_root;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 59be81206dd7..db1b5ef479cf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -538,4 +538,5 @@ struct list_head *btrfs_get_fs_uuids(void);
 void btrfs_set_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 void btrfs_reset_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);

+bool btrfs_check_rw_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 #endif

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to