On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:00:25AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> In the following situation, scrub will calculate wrong parity to
> overwrite correct one:
> 
> RAID5 full stripe:
> 
> Before
> |     Dev 1      |     Dev  2     |     Dev 3     |
> | Data stripe 1  | Data stripe 2  | Parity Stripe |
> --------------------------------------------------- 0
> | 0x0000 (Bad)   |     0xcdcd     |     0x0000    |
> --------------------------------------------------- 4K
> |     0xcdcd     |     0xcdcd     |     0x0000    |
> ...
> |     0xcdcd     |     0xcdcd     |     0x0000    |
> --------------------------------------------------- 64K
> 
> After scrubbing dev3 only:
> 
> |     Dev 1      |     Dev  2     |     Dev 3     |
> | Data stripe 1  | Data stripe 2  | Parity Stripe |
> --------------------------------------------------- 0
> | 0xcdcd (Good)  |     0xcdcd     | 0xcdcd (Bad)  |
> --------------------------------------------------- 4K
> |     0xcdcd     |     0xcdcd     |     0x0000    |
> ...
> |     0xcdcd     |     0xcdcd     |     0x0000    |
> --------------------------------------------------- 64K
> 
> The reason is after raid56 read rebuild rbio->stripe_pages are all
> correct recovered (0xcd for data stripes).
> 
> However when we check and repair parity, in
> scrub_parity_check_and_repair(), we will appending pages in
> sparity->spages list to rbio->bio_pages[], which contains old on-disk
> data.
> 
> And when we submit parity data to disk, we calculate parity using
> rbio->bio_pages[] first, if rbio->bio_pages[] not found, then fallback
> to rbio->stripe_pages[].
> 
> The patch fix it by not appending pages from sparity->spages.
> So finish_parity_scrub() will use rbio->stripe_pages[] which is correct.

Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>

Thanks,

-liubo
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index 6832feece7a7..2a5458004279 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -2957,7 +2957,6 @@ static void scrub_parity_check_and_repair(struct 
> scrub_parity *sparity)
>       struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
>       struct bio *bio;
>       struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio;
> -     struct scrub_page *spage;
>       struct btrfs_bio *bbio = NULL;
>       u64 length;
>       int ret;
> @@ -2987,9 +2986,6 @@ static void scrub_parity_check_and_repair(struct 
> scrub_parity *sparity)
>       if (!rbio)
>               goto rbio_out;
>  
> -     list_for_each_entry(spage, &sparity->spages, list)
> -             raid56_add_scrub_pages(rbio, spage->page, spage->logical);
> -
>       scrub_pending_bio_inc(sctx);
>       raid56_parity_submit_scrub_rbio(rbio);
>       return;
> -- 
> 2.12.1
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to