At 04/07/2017 08:00 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:52:15PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
@@ -3355,12 +3355,14 @@ static int cache_save_setup(struct 
btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
        struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
        struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->tree_root;
        struct inode *inode = NULL;
+       struct extent_changeset data_reserved;

Size of this structure is 40 bytes, and it's being added to many
functions. This will be noticeable on the stack consumption.

-extent-tree.c:btrfs_check_data_free_space              40 static
-extent-tree.c:cache_save_setup                         96 static
+extent-tree.c:btrfs_check_data_free_space              48 static
+extent-tree.c:cache_save_setup                         136 static
-file.c:__btrfs_buffered_write                          192 static
+file.c:__btrfs_buffered_write                          232 static
-file.c:btrfs_fallocate                                 208 static
+file.c:btrfs_fallocate                                 248 static
-inode-map.c:btrfs_save_ino_cache                       112 static
+inode-map.c:btrfs_save_ino_cache                       152 static
-inode.c:btrfs_direct_IO                                128 static
+inode.c:btrfs_direct_IO                                176 static
-inode.c:btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker                   88 static
+inode.c:btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker                   128 static
-inode.c:btrfs_truncate_block                           136 static
+inode.c:btrfs_truncate_block                           176 static
-inode.c:btrfs_page_mkwrite                             112 static
+inode.c:btrfs_page_mkwrite                             152 static
+ioctl.c:cluster_pages_for_defrag                       200 static
-ioctl.c:btrfs_defrag_file                              312 static
+ioctl.c:btrfs_defrag_file                              232 static
-qgroup.c:btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data                     136 static
+qgroup.c:btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data                     128 static
-relocation.c:prealloc_file_extent_cluster              152 static
+relocation.c:prealloc_file_extent_cluster              192 static

There are generic functions so this will affect non-qgroup workloads as
well. So there need to be a dynamic allocation (which would add another
point of failure), or reworked in another way.

Well, I'll try to rework this to allocate extent_changeset inside btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(), so that callers only need extra 8 bytes stack space, and no need to introduce extra error handlers.

Thanks,
Qu



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to