David,

Based on the comments received, I have to pull back patch 1/7 to 3/7 and instead have replaced them with a patch as below.

    [patch] btrfs: add framework to handle device flush error as a volume


Thanks, Anand


On 04/19/2017 12:29 PM, Anand Jain wrote:


On 04/18/2017 09:54 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:22:47AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
As of now we do alloc an empty bio and then use the flag REQ_PREFLUSH
to flush the device cache, instead we can use blkdev_issue_flush()
for this puspose.

This would change the scheduling characteristics. Right now, the caller
thread submits all bios from one thread, lets block layer do it's work,
and then in the same thread wait for each of the submitted bios.

In your code, the btrfs thread prepares tasks for each bio, shifts the
work to the global workqueue (schedule_work) and then it's same as
before.

I'm concerned about using the global queue. As the bio submission jobs
could get blocked by some other unrelated task queued there, the
guarantees depend on the forward progress of the tasks scheduled
(plus block layer processing).

In the current behaviour, the guarantees stand on the block layer only.

We could introduce yet another work queue and submit the bios there,
with possible fine tuning of the flags, like priority or emergency etc.
But that sounds like unnecessary work as we can simply keep the code
as-is and get the same end result.

 I had to schedule the flush to request flush for all the devices in
 parallel. For the obvious reason that flush may take a lot of time
 for the devices which aren't missing. blkdev_issue_flush() uses
 submit_bio_wait() which makes sense for the non-volume-based-FS.
 And there isn't something like blkdev_issue_flush_no_wait(). Also
 now I see that there isn't the btrfsic part in the patch.
 To fix this I think pre-alloc-ed bio for the flush is a good idea
 (as you suggested earlier). Further as the commit thread doesn't
 overlap, and barrier device happens only at the commit so there
 won't be concurrent demand for the pre-alloc-ed bio.
 Also pre-alloc-ed bio can be alloc-ed only when barrier is enabled
 as a mem optimization. Will send a RFC code for the comments with
 these changes.


Regarding other patches, some of them are independent so I'll see what
can be merged now regardless of the above comments.

Thanks, Anand


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to