On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com> wrote:
> Currently the struct space_info creation code is intermixed in the
> udpate_space_info function. There are well-defined points at which the we

^^^ update_space_info

> actually want to create brand-new space_info structs (e.g. during mount of
> the filesystem as well as sometimes when adding/initialising new chunks). In
> such cases udpate_space_info is called with 0 as the bytes parameter. All of
> this makes for spaghetti code.
>
> Fix it by factoring out the creation code in a separate create_space_info
> structure. This also allows to simplify the internals. Furthermore it will
> make the update_space_info function not fail, allowing to remove error
> handling in callers. This will come in a follow up patch.
>
> This bears no functional changes
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Mahoney <je...@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 127 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> Change since v1:
>
>  Incorporated Jeff Mahoney's feedback and added his reviewed-by
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index be5477676cc8..28848e45b018 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -3914,15 +3914,58 @@ static const char *alloc_name(u64 flags)
>         };
>  }
>
> +static int create_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags,
> +                            struct btrfs_space_info **new) {
> +
> +       struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
> +       int i;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       space_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*space_info), GFP_NOFS);
> +       if (!space_info)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       ret = percpu_counter_init(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned, 0, 
> GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               kfree(space_info);
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++)
> +               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&space_info->block_groups[i]);
> +       init_rwsem(&space_info->groups_sem);
> +       spin_lock_init(&space_info->lock);
> +       space_info->flags = flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK;
> +       space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
> +       init_waitqueue_head(&space_info->wait);
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&space_info->ro_bgs);
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&space_info->tickets);
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&space_info->priority_tickets);
> +
> +       ret = kobject_init_and_add(&space_info->kobj, &space_info_ktype,
> +                                   info->space_info_kobj, "%s",
> +                                   alloc_name(space_info->flags));
> +       if (ret) {
> +               percpu_counter_destroy(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned);
> +               kfree(space_info);
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       *new = space_info;
> +       list_add_rcu(&space_info->list, &info->space_info);
> +       if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
> +               info->data_sinfo = space_info;
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags,
>                              u64 total_bytes, u64 bytes_used,
>                              u64 bytes_readonly,
>                              struct btrfs_space_info **space_info)
>  {
>         struct btrfs_space_info *found;
> -       int i;
>         int factor;
> -       int ret;
>
>         if (flags & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 |
>                      BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10))
> @@ -3946,53 +3989,6 @@ static int update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *info, u64 flags,
>                 *space_info = found;
>                 return 0;
>         }
> -       found = kzalloc(sizeof(*found), GFP_NOFS);
> -       if (!found)
> -               return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -       ret = percpu_counter_init(&found->total_bytes_pinned, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (ret) {
> -               kfree(found);
> -               return ret;
> -       }
> -
> -       for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++)
> -               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&found->block_groups[i]);
> -       init_rwsem(&found->groups_sem);
> -       spin_lock_init(&found->lock);
> -       found->flags = flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK;
> -       found->total_bytes = total_bytes;
> -       found->disk_total = total_bytes * factor;
> -       found->bytes_used = bytes_used;
> -       found->disk_used = bytes_used * factor;
> -       found->bytes_pinned = 0;
> -       found->bytes_reserved = 0;
> -       found->bytes_readonly = bytes_readonly;
> -       found->bytes_may_use = 0;
> -       found->full = 0;
> -       found->max_extent_size = 0;
> -       found->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
> -       found->chunk_alloc = 0;
> -       found->flush = 0;
> -       init_waitqueue_head(&found->wait);
> -       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&found->ro_bgs);
> -       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&found->tickets);
> -       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&found->priority_tickets);
> -
> -       ret = kobject_init_and_add(&found->kobj, &space_info_ktype,
> -                                   info->space_info_kobj, "%s",
> -                                   alloc_name(found->flags));
> -       if (ret) {
> -               kfree(found);
> -               return ret;
> -       }
> -
> -       *space_info = found;
> -       list_add_rcu(&found->list, &info->space_info);
> -       if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
> -               info->data_sinfo = found;
> -
> -       return ret;
>  }
>
>  static void set_avail_alloc_bits(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
> @@ -4495,10 +4491,9 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
> *trans,
>
>         space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, flags);
>         if (!space_info) {
> -               ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
> +               ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
>                 BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
>         }
> -       BUG_ON(!space_info); /* Logic error */

Isn't removing this BUG_ON a functional change?
I understand that it shouldn't happen in the current incarnation of
create_space_info, but that was true before the patch as well

>
>  again:
>         spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
> @@ -5763,7 +5758,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_reserve_metadata(struct 
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>          */
>         u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
>
> -       trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "orphan", btrfs_ino(inode),
> +       trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "orphan", btrfs_ino(inode),
>                         num_bytes, 1);
>         return btrfs_block_rsv_migrate(src_rsv, dst_rsv, num_bytes, 1);
>  }
> @@ -10191,16 +10186,18 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct 
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>         }
>  #endif
>         /*
> -        * Call to ensure the corresponding space_info object is created and
> -        * assigned to our block group, but don't update its counters just 
> yet.
> -        * We want our bg to be added to the rbtree with its ->space_info set.
> +        * Ensure the corresponding space_info object is created and
> +        * assigned to our block group. We want our bg to be added to the 
> rbtree
> +        * with its ->space_info set.
>          */
> -       ret = update_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags, 0, 0, 0,
> -                               &cache->space_info);
> -       if (ret) {
> -               btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
> -               btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> -               return ret;
> +       cache->space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags);
> +       if (!cache->space_info) {
> +               ret = create_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags, 
> &cache->space_info);
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
> +                       btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> +                       return ret;
> +               }
>         }
>
>         ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(fs_info, cache);
> @@ -10774,21 +10771,21 @@ int btrfs_init_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *fs_info)
>                 mixed = 1;
>
>         flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM;
> -       ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
> +       ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
>         if (ret)
>                 goto out;
>
>         if (mixed) {
>                 flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
> -               ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
> +               ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
>         } else {
>                 flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
> -               ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
> +               ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
>                 if (ret)
>                         goto out;
>
>                 flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
> -               ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
> +               ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
>         }
>  out:
>         return ret;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to