From: Omar Sandoval <osan...@fb.com>

The extents marked in pin_down_extent() will be unpinned later in
unpin_extent_range(), which decrements total_bytes_pinned.
pin_down_extent() must increment the counter to avoid underflowing it.
Also adjust btrfs_free_tree_block() to avoid accounting for the same
extent twice.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osan...@fb.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 6032e9a635f2..9cff937415cb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -6343,6 +6343,7 @@ static int pin_down_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 
        trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "pinned",
                                      cache->space_info->flags, num_bytes, 1);
+       percpu_counter_add(&cache->space_info->total_bytes_pinned, num_bytes);
        set_extent_dirty(fs_info->pinned_extents, bytenr,
                         bytenr + num_bytes - 1, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
        return 0;
@@ -7189,6 +7190,7 @@ void btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
*trans,
                                goto out;
                }
 
+               pin = 0;
                cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, buf->start);
 
                if (btrfs_header_flag(buf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN)) {
@@ -7204,7 +7206,6 @@ void btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
*trans,
                btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(cache, buf->len, 0);
                btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
                trace_btrfs_reserved_extent_free(fs_info, buf->start, buf->len);
-               pin = 0;
        }
 out:
        if (pin)
-- 
2.13.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to