On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:12:56PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote: > As Qu mentioned in this thread > (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg64469.html), compression > can cause regular extent to co-exist with inlined extent. This coexistence > makes things confusing. Since it was permitted currently, so fix > btrfsck to prevent a bunch of error logs that will make user feel > panic. > > When check file extent, record the extent_end of regular extent to check > if there is a gap between the regular extents. Normally there is only one > inlined extent, so the extent_end of inlined extent is useless. However, > if regular extent can co-exist with inlined extent, the extent_end of > inlined extent also need to record. > > Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <m...@merlins.org> > Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Applied, thanks. Do you have a test for that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
