The last user of num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures is
barrier_all_devices().
But it's can be easily changed to new per-chunk degradable check
framework.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 16 +++-------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 6ba2a53999f9..7ec766d8510f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3518,20 +3518,10 @@ static int wait_dev_flush(struct btrfs_device *device)
        return bio->bi_error;
 }
 
-static int check_barrier_error(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fsdevs)
+static int check_barrier_error(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 {
-       int dev_flush_error = 0;
-       struct btrfs_device *dev;
-
-       list_for_each_entry_rcu(dev, &fsdevs->devices, dev_list) {
-               if (!dev->bdev || dev->last_flush_error)
-                       dev_flush_error++;
-       }
-
-       if (dev_flush_error >
-           fsdevs->fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures)
+       if (!btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info))
                return -EIO;
-
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3586,7 +3576,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
                 * to arrive at the volume status. So error checking
                 * is being pushed to a separate loop.
                 */
-               return check_barrier_error(info->fs_devices);
+               return check_barrier_error(info);
        }
        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.13.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to