On 8/7/17 1:19 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote: > On 8/7/17 10:12 AM, Angel Shtilianov wrote: >> Hi there, >> I'm investigating sporadic hanging during btrfs umount. The FS is >> contained in a loop mounted file. >> I have no reproduction scenario and the issue may happen once a day or >> once a month. It is rare, but frustrating. >> I have a crashdump (the server has been manually crashed and collected >> a crashdump), so I could take look through the data structures. >> What happens is that umount is getting in D state and a the kernel >> complains about hung tasks. We are using kernel 4.4.y The actual back >> trace is from 4.4.70, but this happens with all the 4.4 kernels I've >> used (4.4.30 through 4.4.70). >> Tasks like: >> INFO: task kworker/u32:9:27574 blocked for more than 120 seconds. >> INFO: task kworker/u32:12:27575 blocked for more than 120 seconds. >> INFO: task btrfs-transacti:31625 blocked for more than 120 seconds. >> are getting blocked waiting for btrfs_tree_read_lock, which is owned >> by task umount:31696 (which is also blocked for more than 120 seconds) >> regarding the lock debug. >> >> umount is hung in "cache_block_group", see the '>' mark: >> while (cache->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_FAST) { >> struct btrfs_caching_control *ctl; >> >> ctl = cache->caching_ctl; >> atomic_inc(&ctl->count); >> prepare_to_wait(&ctl->wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); >> spin_unlock(&cache->lock); >> >>> schedule(); >> >> finish_wait(&ctl->wait, &wait); >> put_caching_control(ctl); >> spin_lock(&cache->lock); >> } >> >> The complete backtraces could be found in the attached log. >> >> Do you have any ideas ? > > Hi Angel - > > In your log, it says lockdep is disabled. What tripped it earlier? > Lockdep really should be catching locking deadlocks in situations like > this, if that's really the underlying cause.
Actually, I'm not sure if lockdep would catch this one. Here's my hypothesis: kworker/u32:9 is waiting on a read lock while reading the free space cache, which means it owns the cache->cached value and will issue the wakeup when it completes. umount is waiting on for the wakeup from kworker/u32:9 but is holding some tree locks in write mode. If kworker/u32:9 is waiting on the locks that umount holds, we have a deadlock. Can you dump the extent buffer that kworker/u32:9 is waiting on? Part of that will contain the PID of the holder, and if matches umount, we found the cause. -Jeff -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature