On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:18:45PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> Calculate byte core set for data sample:
> Sort bucket's numbers in decreasing order
> Count how many numbers use 90% of sample
> If core set are low (<=25%), data are easily compressible
> If core set high (>=80%), data are not compressible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Timofey Titovets <nefelim...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/heuristic.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/heuristic.c b/fs/btrfs/heuristic.c
> index ef723e991576..df0cefa42857 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/heuristic.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/heuristic.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/pagemap.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/bio.h>
> +#include <linux/sort.h>
>  #include "compression.h"
> 
>  #define READ_SIZE 16
> @@ -25,6 +26,8 @@
>  #define BUCKET_SIZE 256
>  #define MAX_SAMPLE_SIZE (BTRFS_MAX_UNCOMPRESSED*READ_SIZE/ITER_SHIFT)
>  #define BYTE_SET_THRESHOLD 64
> +#define BYTE_CORE_SET_LOW  BYTE_SET_THRESHOLD
> +#define BYTE_CORE_SET_HIGH 200 // ~80%

Please don't use the // c++ style of comments.

> 
>  struct bucket_item {
>       u32 count;
> @@ -67,6 +70,45 @@ static struct list_head *heuristic_alloc_workspace(void)
>       return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  }
> 
> +/* For bucket sorting */

"Compare buckets by size, ascending */

> +static inline int bucket_compare(const void *lv, const void *rv)
> +{
> +     struct bucket_item *l = (struct bucket_item *)(lv);
> +     struct bucket_item *r = (struct bucket_item *)(rv);

The const should be used also for the specific types.

> +
> +     return r->count - l->count;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Byte Core set size
> + * How many bytes use 90% of sample
> + */
> +static int byte_core_set_size(struct workspace *ws)
> +{
> +     u32 a = 0;
> +     u32 coreset_sum = 0;
> +     u32 core_set_threshold = ws->sample_size*90/100;

        u32 core_set_threshold = ws->sample_size * 90 / 100;

> +     struct bucket_item *bucket = ws->bucket;
> +
> +     /* Sort in reverse order */

So if it's reverse, please add _rev to the end of the comparator
function. The common naming is "comp_WHAT" so I suggest to use
comp_bucket_rev.

> +     sort(bucket, BUCKET_SIZE, sizeof(*bucket),
> +          &bucket_compare, NULL);
> +
> +     for (; a < BYTE_CORE_SET_LOW; a++)
> +             coreset_sum += bucket[a].count;
> +
> +     if (coreset_sum > core_set_threshold)
> +             return a;
> +
> +     for (; a < BYTE_CORE_SET_HIGH && bucket[a].count > 0; a++) {
> +             coreset_sum += bucket[a].count;
> +             if (coreset_sum > core_set_threshold)
> +                     break;
> +     }
> +
> +     return a;
> +}
> +
>  static u32 byte_set_size(const struct workspace *ws)
>  {
>       u32 a = 0;
> @@ -164,7 +206,14 @@ static int heuristic(struct list_head *ws, struct inode 
> *inode,
>       if (a > BYTE_SET_THRESHOLD)
>               return 2;
> 
> -     return 1;
> +     a = byte_core_set_size(workspace);
> +     if (a <= BYTE_CORE_SET_LOW)
> +             return 3;
> +
> +     if (a >= BYTE_CORE_SET_HIGH)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     return 4;
>  }
> 
>  const struct btrfs_compress_op btrfs_heuristic = {
> --
> 2.14.1
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to