On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:48:05PM +0300, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > Commit a53f4f8e9c8eb ("btrfs: Don't call btrfs_start_transaction() on > frozen fs to avoid deadlock.") started using internal calls and we > replace them with more suitable ones. > > Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rak...@tuxera.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/super.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c > index 35a128a..99c21ae 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c > @@ -1205,8 +1205,8 @@ int btrfs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait) > * happens. The pending operations are delayed to the > * next commit after thawing. > */ > - if (__sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE, false)) > - __sb_end_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE); > + if (sb_start_write_trylock(sb)) > + sb_end_write(sb)
CC [M] fs/btrfs/print-tree.o fs/btrfs/super.c: In function ‘btrfs_sync_fs’: fs/btrfs/super.c:1210:4: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘else’ else ^~~~ will be fixed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html