On 13.10.2017 23:51, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:38:50AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10.10.2017 20:53, Liu Bo wrote:
>>> We've avoided data losing raid profile when doing balance, but it
>>> turns out that deleting a device could also result in the same
>>> problem
>>>
>>> This fixes the problem by creating an empty data chunk before
>>> relocating the data chunk.
>>
>> Why is this needed - copy the metadata of the to-be-relocated chunk into
>> the newly created empty chunk? I don't entirely understand that code but
>> doesn't this seem a bit like a hack in order to stash some information?
>> Perhaps you could elaborate the logic a bit more in the changelog?
>>
>>>
>>> Metadata/System chunk are supposed to have non-zero bytes all the time
>>> so their raid profile is persistent.
>>
>> I think this changelog is a bit scarce on detail as to the culprit of
>> the problem. Could you perhaps put a sentence or two what the underlying
>> logic which deletes the raid profile if a chunk is empty ?
>>
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> The problem is as same as what commit 2c9fe8355258 ("btrfs: Fix
> lost-data-profile caused by balance bg") had fixed.
> 
> Similar to doing balance, deleting a device can also move all chunks
> on this disk to other available disks, after 'move' successfully,
> it'll remove those chunks.
> 
> If our last data chunk is empty and part of it happens to be on this
          ^
"Last data chunk" of which disk - the "to-be-removed" one or the disk to
which chunks have been relocated?

> disk, then there is no data chunk in this btrfs after deleting the
   ^
Which disk are you referring to - the one being removed?
> device successfully, any following write will try to create a new data
> chunk which ends up with a single data chunk because the only
> available data raid profile is 'single'.
> 
> thanks,
> -liubo
> 
>>>
>>> Reported-by: James Alandt <james.ala...@wdc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v2: - return the correct error.
>>>     - move helper ahead of __btrfs_balance().
>>>
>>>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 84 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>>> index 4a72c45..a74396d 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>>> @@ -3018,6 +3018,48 @@ static int btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks(struct 
>>> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>>>     return ret;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +/*
>>> + * return 1 : allocate a data chunk successfully,
>>> + * return <0: errors during allocating a data chunk,
>>> + * return 0 : no need to allocate a data chunk.
>>> + */
>>> +static int btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>> +                                 u64 chunk_offset)
>>> +{
>>> +   struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache;
>>> +   u64 bytes_used;
>>> +   u64 chunk_type;
>>> +
>>> +   cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, chunk_offset);
>>> +   ASSERT(cache);
>>> +   chunk_type = cache->flags;
>>> +   btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
>>> +
>>> +   if (chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
>>> +           spin_lock(&fs_info->data_sinfo->lock);
>>> +           bytes_used = fs_info->data_sinfo->bytes_used;
>>> +           spin_unlock(&fs_info->data_sinfo->lock);
>>> +
>>> +           if (!bytes_used) {
>>> +                   struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
>>> +                   int ret;
>>> +
>>> +                   trans = btrfs_join_transaction(fs_info->tree_root);
>>> +                   if (IS_ERR(trans))
>>> +                           return PTR_ERR(trans);
>>> +
>>> +                   ret = btrfs_force_chunk_alloc(trans, fs_info,
>>> +                                                 BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA);
>>> +                   btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
>>> +                   if (ret < 0)
>>> +                           return ret;
>>> +
>>> +                   return 1;
>>> +           }
>>> +   }
>>> +   return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static int insert_balance_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>>                            struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -3476,7 +3518,6 @@ static int __btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info 
>>> *fs_info)
>>>     u32 count_meta = 0;
>>>     u32 count_sys = 0;
>>>     int chunk_reserved = 0;
>>> -   u64 bytes_used = 0;
>>>  
>>>     /* step one make some room on all the devices */
>>>     devices = &fs_info->fs_devices->devices;
>>> @@ -3635,28 +3676,21 @@ static int __btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info 
>>> *fs_info)
>>>                     goto loop;
>>>             }
>>>  
>>> -           ASSERT(fs_info->data_sinfo);
>>> -           spin_lock(&fs_info->data_sinfo->lock);
>>> -           bytes_used = fs_info->data_sinfo->bytes_used;
>>> -           spin_unlock(&fs_info->data_sinfo->lock);
>>> -
>>> -           if ((chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) &&
>>> -               !chunk_reserved && !bytes_used) {
>>> -                   trans = btrfs_start_transaction(chunk_root, 0);
>>> -                   if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
>>> -                           mutex_unlock(&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex);
>>> -                           ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
>>> -                           goto error;
>>> -                   }
>>> -
>>> -                   ret = btrfs_force_chunk_alloc(trans, fs_info,
>>> -                                                 BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA);
>>> -                   btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
>>> +           if (!chunk_reserved) {
>>> +                   /*
>>> +                    * We may be relocating the only data chunk we have,
>>> +                    * which could potentially end up with losing data's
>>> +                    * raid profile, so lets allocate an empty one in
>>> +                    * advance.
>>> +                    */
>>> +                   ret = btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk(fs_info,
>>> +                                                    found_key.offset);
>>>                     if (ret < 0) {
>>>                             mutex_unlock(&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex);
>>>                             goto error;
>>> +                   } else if (ret == 1) {
>>> +                           chunk_reserved = 1;
>>>                     }
>>> -                   chunk_reserved = 1;
>>>             }
>>>  
>>>             ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(fs_info, found_key.offset);
>>> @@ -4419,6 +4453,18 @@ int btrfs_shrink_device(struct btrfs_device *device, 
>>> u64 new_size)
>>>             chunk_offset = btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_offset(l, dev_extent);
>>>             btrfs_release_path(path);
>>>  
>>> +           /*
>>> +            * We may be relocating the only data chunk we have,
>>> +            * which could potentially end up with losing data's
>>> +            * raid profile, so lets allocate an empty one in
>>> +            * advance.
>>> +            */
>>> +           ret = btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk(fs_info, chunk_offset);
>>> +           if (ret < 0) {
>>> +                   mutex_unlock(&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex);
>>> +                   goto done;
>>> +           }
>>> +
>>>             ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(fs_info, chunk_offset);
>>>             mutex_unlock(&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex);
>>>             if (ret && ret != -ENOSPC)
>>>
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to