On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 07:16:02AM +0000, Gu, Jinxiang wrote: > Hi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eryu Guan [mailto:eg...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:52 PM > > To: Gu, Jinxiang/顾 金香 <g...@cn.fujitsu.com> > > Cc: fste...@vger.kernel.org; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Add message indicating btrfs-progs support > > FST in read-only mode > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 01:57:46PM +0800, Gu Jinxiang wrote: > > > From: Gu JinXiang <g...@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > > > > btrfs-progs now support FST in read-only mode, so when space_cache=v2 > > > enabled, this test case will fail. > > > Add message to help user to understand this status. > > > > Sorry, I don't quite understand the new 'FST' feature. But is it a bug that > > we want to fix when mounting with space_cache=v2 > > option, or we just couldn't do btrfs-convert in this case? If it's a real > > bug, I'd say let the test fail as it is, and > > track bug in tools like bugzilla not comments/messages in the test; if it's > > the latter case, then just _notrun the test > > if space_cache=v2 option is specified, e.g. > > > > _exclude_scratch_mount_option "space_cache=v2" > Thank you for your suggestion. > As an known behavior when use btrfs-convert when space_cache=v2 enabled, I > prefer to modify this case not to be run. > I all send a new patch for this.
But from what Qu said in his reply, it looks like this is a real bug in btrfs-convert, so I don't think _notrun is a good idea. I'd leave the test as it is, because that's a bug and this test finds it. Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
