In the print_inode_item(), the argument order of sequence and flags are
reversed:
printf("... sequence %llu flags 0x%llx(%s)\n",
...
(unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_flags(eb,ii),
(unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_sequence(eb, ii),
...)
So, just fix it.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
print-tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
index 3c585e3..8abd760 100644
--- a/print-tree.c
+++ b/print-tree.c
@@ -896,8 +896,8 @@ static void print_inode_item(struct extent_buffer *eb,
btrfs_inode_uid(eb, ii),
btrfs_inode_gid(eb, ii),
(unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_rdev(eb,ii),
- (unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_flags(eb,ii),
(unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_sequence(eb, ii),
+ (unsigned long long)btrfs_inode_flags(eb,ii),
flags_str);
print_timespec(eb, btrfs_inode_atime(ii), "\t\tatime ", "\n");
print_timespec(eb, btrfs_inode_ctime(ii), "\t\tctime ", "\n");
--
2.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
