On 11/17/2017 01:36 PM, Anand Jain wrote: > If the device is not present at the time of (-o degrade) mount, > the mount context will create a dummy missing struct btrfs_device. > Later this device may reappear after the FS is mounted and > then device is included in the device list but it missed the > open_device part. So this patch handles that case by going > through the open_device steps which this device missed and finally > adds to the device alloc list.
What happens if the first devices got writes before the "last device" is joined ? Supposing to have a raid1 pair of devices: sda, sdb - sda is dissappeared (usb detached ?) - the filesystem is mounted as mount -o degraded /dev/sdb - some writes happens on /dev/sdb - the user reattach /dev/sda - udev run "btrfs dev scan" - the system joins /dev/sda to the filesystem disks pool Because the filesystem is a raid1, btrfs may read from /dev/sdb (updated data) or /dev/sda (old data), or worse read something from the former and something from the later (metadata from sda and data from sdb ) ??? Am I missing something ? BR G.Baroncelli -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html