From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

The function update_share_count is local to the source and does
not need to be in global scope, so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warning:
fs/btrfs/backref.c:219:6: warning: symbol 'update_share_count' was not
declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/backref.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index 7d0dc100a09a..e4054e533f6d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ static int prelim_ref_compare(struct prelim_ref *ref1,
        return 0;
 }
 
-void update_share_count(struct share_check *sc, int oldcount, int newcount)
+static void update_share_count(struct share_check *sc, int oldcount,
+                              int newcount)
 {
        if ((!sc) || (oldcount == 0 && newcount < 1))
                return;
-- 
2.14.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to