Hi,
the patch unfortunately did not work, because I didn't know for which
version/tree was made, since it does not apply for 4.14. or 4.15. But
since I got your hint with the possibility of the old age of my btrfs
volume, I simply tried an old ubuntu live disk, and it mounted the
volume :-) Then I started a balance of the metadata, and hope it
reloacted the unfavorable placed block and voila - it is also
mountable in newer kernels. Then I updated my arch kernel in chroot
and now my system is running again.
I know changed to DUP metadata profile and currently I run a scrub,
but I hope there are no more serious errors.
I don't know whether the patch for checking bytenr < sectorsize should
be seen as regression bug, or the block was simply placed wrong by the
bcache bug.
All in all: Many thanks for the help !
kind regards
Benjamin
2017-12-11 0:50 GMT+01:00 Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com>:
>
>
> On 2017年12月11日 05:16, Benjamin Beichler wrote:
>> The patch let the chunk-recover be successful. But I'm no lucky man,
>> the recovered chunk tree does not work or other metadata is also
>> broken.
>>
>> Mounting the system is not successful (dmesg):
>> BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupt node, invalid item slot:
>> block=16384, root=1, slot=0
>> BTRFS error (device dm-0): failed to read chunk root
>> BTRFS error (device dm-0): open_ctree failed
>
> For this error, you could apply this diff to by-pass it:
>
> ------
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> index ce4ed6ec8f39..355220e21c2e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> @@ -413,12 +413,6 @@ int btrfs_check_node(struct btrfs_root *root,
> struct extent_buffer *node)
> btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(node, &key, slot);
> btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(node, &next_key, slot + 1);
>
> - if (!bytenr) {
> - generic_err(root, node, slot,
> - "invalid NULL node pointer");
> - ret = -EUCLEAN;
> - goto out;
> - }
> if (!IS_ALIGNED(bytenr, root->fs_info->sectorsize)) {
> generic_err(root, node, slot,
> "unaligned pointer, have %llu should be aligned
> to %u",
> ------
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>>
>> Therefore I tried a btrfs check --repair, this time without error:
>> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5cf7ad9e187032d2c94db4f91bb62c24
>>
>> Then I tried btrfs check --init-extent-tree and this produces much
>> output. I put the beginning into here:
>> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/70e2482646a8235ee2327105d920dadd
>> From a fast view, the messages keep to be similar to the last of the
>> gist, but the messages in the beginning are not repeating. If it helps
>> I have complete compressed log.
>>
>> Then I tried a btrfs recover to get files, but for many files (also
>> improtant data, but I filtered the output) I get outputs like in:
>> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/1cc7f7ab5af33e76d0bf80960bb300eb
>>
>> Any new suggestions?
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
