On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:06:18PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Commit 0e8c36a9fd81 ("Btrfs: fix lots of orphan inodes when the space
> is not enough") changed the way transaction reservation is made in
> btrfs_evict_node and as a result this function became unused. This has
> been the status quo for 5 years in which time no one noticed, so I'd
> say it's safe to assume it's unlikely it will ever be used again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>

https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=142117508730660&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142119399504907&w=2

"Transcaction API, removing the func does not make sense without
removing BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT at the same time."

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 10 +---------
>  fs/btrfs/transaction.h |  3 ---
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> index 5a8c2649af2f..b1793688c716 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned int 
> num_items,
>        * and then we deadlock with somebody doing a freeze.
>        *
>        * If we are ATTACH, it means we just want to catch the current
> -      * transaction and commit it, so we needn't do sb_start_intwrite(). 
> +      * transaction and commit it, so we needn't do sb_start_intwrite().

Unrelated change.

>        */
>       if (type & __TRANS_FREEZABLE)
>               sb_start_intwrite(fs_info->sb);
> @@ -658,14 +658,6 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle 
> *btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(
>       return trans;
>  }
>  
> -struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_lflush(
> -                                     struct btrfs_root *root,
> -                                     unsigned int num_items)
> -{
> -     return start_transaction(root, num_items, TRANS_START,
> -                              BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT, true);
> -}
> -
>  struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root)
>  {
>       return start_transaction(root, 0, TRANS_JOIN, BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH,
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
> index c55e44560103..9b25b0ba92ee 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
> @@ -187,9 +187,6 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle 
> *btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(
>                                       struct btrfs_root *root,
>                                       unsigned int num_items,
>                                       int min_factor);
> -struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_lflush(
> -                                     struct btrfs_root *root,
> -                                     unsigned int num_items);
>  struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root);
>  struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(struct btrfs_root 
> *root);
>  struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_attach_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to