On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:46:23PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices from device_list_add() its > better to get pointer to btrfs_device, then we have both, pointer > to btrfs_device and btrfs_fs_devices. This is needed in preparation > to add handling reappearing missing device feature. > > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
Can we just change device_list_add to return struct btrfs_device * instead, and just do PTR_ERR() if there's a problem? Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
