On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:12 PM, jianchao.wang
<jianchao.w.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/13/2018 05:19 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Sorry but I only retrieved the blk-mq debugfs several minutes after the hang
>> started so I'm not sure the state information is relevant. Anyway, I have 
>> attached
>> it to this e-mail. The most remarkable part is the following:
>>
>> ./000000009ddfa913/requeue_list:000000009646711c {.op=READ, .state=idle, 
>> gen=0x1
>> 18, abort_gen=0x0, .cmd_flags=, .rq_flags=SORTED|1|SOFTBARRIER|IO_STAT, 
>> complete
>> =0, .tag=-1, .internal_tag=217}
>>
>> The hexadecimal number at the start is the request_queue pointer (I modified 
>> the
>> blk-mq-debugfs code such that queues are registered with there address just 
>> after
>> creation and until a name is assigned). This is a dm-mpath queue.
>
> There seems to be something wrong in hctx->nr_active.

Then looks it is same with the issue I saw during starting multipathd, and the
following patch should fix that, if there isn't other issue.

        https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=151586577400558&w=2

-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to