On 17.01.2018 07:17, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Function btrfs_delete_one_dir_name() will check if the dir_item is the > last content of the item, and delete the whole item if needed. > > However if @name_len of one dir_item/dir_index is corrupted and larger > than the item size, the function will still try to treat it as partly > remove, which will screw up the whole leaf. > > This patch will enhance the item deletion check, to cover corrupted name > len, so in that case we just delete the whole item. > > Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com> > --- > dir-item.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dir-item.c b/dir-item.c > index 31ad1eca29d5..7ce3d2a40433 100644 > --- a/dir-item.c > +++ b/dir-item.c > @@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ int btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(struct btrfs_trans_handle > *trans, > struct btrfs_path *path, > struct btrfs_dir_item *di) > { > - > struct extent_buffer *leaf; > u32 sub_item_len; > u32 item_len; > @@ -291,7 +290,15 @@ int btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(struct btrfs_trans_handle > *trans, > sub_item_len = sizeof(*di) + btrfs_dir_name_len(leaf, di) + > btrfs_dir_data_len(leaf, di); > item_len = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, path->slots[0]); > - if (sub_item_len == item_len) { > + > + /* > + * If @sub_item_len is longer than @item_len, then it means the > + * name_len is just corrupted. > + * No good idea to know if there is anything we can recover from > + * the corrupted item. > + * Just delete the item. > + */ > + if (sub_item_len >= item_len) { > ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path); > } else { > unsigned long ptr = (unsigned long)di; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html