On 1/22/18 5:58 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 21.01.2018 21:08, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
>> This warning appears during execution of the LOGICAL_INO ioctl and
>> appears to be spurious:
>>
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391
>> find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
>> Modules linked in: ib_iser rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_core configfs
>> iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi overlay r8169 ufs qnx4
>> hfsplus hfs minix ntfs vfat msdos fat jfs xfs cpuid rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsv4
>> nfsv3 nfs fscache algif_skcipher af_alg softdog nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl
>> lockd grace sunrpc bnep cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave
>> cpufreq_conservative nfnetlink_queue nfnetlink_log nfnetlink bluetooth
>> rfkill snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq_midi snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event
>> snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device binfmt_misc fuse nbd xt_REDIRECT
>> nf_nat_redirect ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_nat xt_conntrack xt_tcpudp
>> nf_log_ipv4 nf_log_common xt_LOG ip6table_nat nf_conntrack_ipv6
>> nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_nat_ipv6 iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4
>> nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack
>> ip6table_mangle iptable_mangle ip6table_filter ip6_tables
>> iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables tcp_cubic dummy lp dm_crypt edac_mce_amd
>> edac_core snd_hda_codec_hdmi ppdev kvm_amd kvm irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul
>> crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec_via pcbc amdkfd
>> snd_hda_codec_generic amd_iommu_v2 aesni_intel snd_hda_intel radeon
>> snd_hda_codec aes_x86_64 snd_hda_core snd_hwdep crypto_simd glue_helper sg
>> snd_pcm_oss cryptd input_leds joydev pcspkr serio_raw snd_mixer_oss rtc_cmos
>> snd_pcm parport_pc parport shpchp wmi acpi_cpufreq evdev snd_timer
>> asus_atk0110 k10temp fam15h_power snd soundcore sp5100_tco hid_generic ipv6
>> af_packet crc_ccitt raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq
>> async_xor async_tx libcrc32c raid0 multipath linear dm_mod raid1 md_mod
>> ohci_pci ide_pci_generic
>> sr_mod cdrom pdc202xx_new ohci_hcd crc32c_intel atiixp ehci_pci
>> psmouse ide_core i2c_piix4 ehci_hcd xhci_pci mii xhci_hcd [last unloaded:
>> r8169]
>> CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G D W L 4.11.9-zb64+ #1
>> Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3,
>> BIOS 2101 12/02/2014
>> Call Trace:
>> dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
>> __warn+0xd1/0xf0
>> warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
>> find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
>> __btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120
>> ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
>> iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300
>> iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
>> ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
>> ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
>> btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820
>> ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200
>> do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700
>> ? __fget+0x112/0x200
>> SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
>> RIP: 0033:0x7f727b20be07
>> RSP: 002b:00007f7279f1e018 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff9c0f4d7f RCX: 00007f727b20be07
>> RDX: 00007f7279f1e118 RSI: 00000000c0389424 RDI: 0000000000000003
>> RBP: 0000000000000035 R08: 00007f72581bf340 R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: 0000000000000020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000040
>> R13: 00007f725818d230 R14: 00007f7279f1b640 R15: 00007f7258000020
>> ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140
>> ---[ end trace 5de243350f6762c6 ]---
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>
>> ref->count can be below zero under normal conditions (for delayed refs),
>> so there is no need to spam dmesg when it happens.
>
> Why do you think it's normal for this to be a negative value under
> normal conditions? There should be some rationale about that otherwise
> you are pampering over a bug.
The ref->count in the prelim_ref can be <0 for a delayed ref that
has a node->action of BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF. The prelim_ref_insert()
relies on this when merging identical refs to keep the overall
count correct. So it looks to me like it should be OK to remove
the WARN.
(However the ref_mod in the btrfs_delayed_ref_node evidently cannot
go <0).
>> On kernel v4.14 this warning occurs 100-1000 times more frequently than
>> on kernels v4.2..v4.12. In the worst case, one test machine had 59020
>> warnings in 24 hours on v4.14.14 compared to 55 on v4.12.14.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8...@umail.furryterror.org>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/backref.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
>> index 7d0dc100a09a..57e8d2562ed5 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
>> @@ -1263,7 +1263,6 @@ static int find_parent_nodes(struct btrfs_trans_handle
>> *trans,
>> while (node) {
>> ref = rb_entry(node, struct prelim_ref, rbnode);
>> node = rb_next(&ref->rbnode);
>> - WARN_ON(ref->count < 0);
>> if (roots && ref->count && ref->root_id && ref->parent == 0) {
>> if (sc && sc->root_objectid &&
>> ref->root_id != sc->root_objectid) {
>>
Reviewed-by: Edmund Nadolski <enadol...@suse.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
