On 13.02.2018 06:35, Anand Jain wrote:
> extent_buffer_uptodate() is a trivial wrapper around test_bit()
> and nothing else. So make it static and inline, save on code
> space and call indirection.
> 
> Before:
>    text          data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 1131257         82898   18992 1233147  12d0fb fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
> 
> After:
>    text          data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 1131090         82898   18992 1232980  12d054 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com> although there is one
nit below

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 5 -----
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index bae57b408901..f300edae044b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -5229,11 +5229,6 @@ void set_extent_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer 
> *eb)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -int extent_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> -{
> -     return test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags);
> -}
> -
>  int read_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
>                            struct extent_buffer *eb, int wait, int mirror_num)
>  {
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> index 72e5af2965a8..953d94662b8e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> @@ -489,7 +489,10 @@ void clear_extent_buffer_dirty(struct extent_buffer *eb);
>  int set_extent_buffer_dirty(struct extent_buffer *eb);
>  void set_extent_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *eb);
>  void clear_extent_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *eb);
> -int extent_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *eb);
> +static inline int extent_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> +{
> +     return test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags);
> +}

nit: It just doesn't look good to have a static inline function
definition among a list of function declarations. A quick look at
extent_io.h shows that this function could have been put below the
inline def of extent_buffer_get.


>  int extent_buffer_under_io(struct extent_buffer *eb);
>  int map_private_extent_buffer(const struct extent_buffer *eb,
>                             unsigned long offset, unsigned long min_len,
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to