On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:33:24AM +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  <bugzi...@redhat.com>
> Date: 21 February 2018 at 16:22
> Subject: [Bug 1547319] 4.16.0-0.rc1.git4.1.fc28.x86_64 #1 Not tainted:
>   possible recursive locking detected
> To: kloczko.tom...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547319
> 
> Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |labb...@redhat.com
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> ---
> This is btrfs which is pretty far down on our priority list. This is best
> reported to the upstream btrfs devs.

Quick and wrong conclusions, it's not a btrfs bug.

The fix:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10207013/

but I don't see it merged in master branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to