On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:33:24AM +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <bugzi...@redhat.com> > Date: 21 February 2018 at 16:22 > Subject: [Bug 1547319] 4.16.0-0.rc1.git4.1.fc28.x86_64 #1 Not tainted: > possible recursive locking detected > To: kloczko.tom...@gmail.com > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547319 > > Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |labb...@redhat.com > > --- Comment #1 from Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> --- > This is btrfs which is pretty far down on our priority list. This is best > reported to the upstream btrfs devs.
Quick and wrong conclusions, it's not a btrfs bug. The fix: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10207013/ but I don't see it merged in master branch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html