Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2018-03-09 11:02, Paul Richards wrote:
Hello there,
I have a 3 disk btrfs RAID 1 filesystem, with a single failed drive.
Before I attempt any recovery I’d like to ask what is the recommended
approach? (The wiki docs suggest consulting here before attempting
recovery[1].)
The system is powered down currently and a replacement drive is being
delivered soon.
Should I use “replace”, or “add” and “delete”?
Once replaced should I rebalance and/or scrub?
I believe that the recovery may involve mounting in degraded mode. If
I do this, how do I later get out of degraded mode, or if it’s
automatic how do i determine when I’m out of degraded mode?
It won't automatically mount degraded, you either have to explicitly ask
it to, or you have to have an option to do so in your default mount
options for the volume in /etc/fstab (which is dangerous for multiple
reasons).
Now, as to what the best way to go about this is, there are three things
to consider:
1. Is the failed disk still usable enough that you can get good data off
of it in a reasonable amount of time? If you're replacing the disk
because of a lot of failed sectors, you can still probably get data off
of it, while something like a head crash isn't worth trying to get data
back.
2. Do you have enough room in the system itself to add another disk
without removing one?
3. Is the replacement disk at least as big as the failed disk?
If the answer to all three is yes, then just put in the new disk, mount
the volume normally (you don't need to mount it degraded if the failed
disk is working this well), and use `btrfs replace` to move the data.
This is the most efficient option in terms of both time and is also
generally the safest (and I personally always over-spec drive-bays in
systems we build where I work specifically so that this approach can be
used).
If the answer to the third question is no, put in the new disk (removing
the failed one first if the answer to the second question is no), mount
the volume (mount it degraded if one of the first two questions is no,
normally otherwise), then add the new disk to the volume with `btrfs
device add` and remove the old one with `btrfs device delete` (using the
'missing' option if you had to remove the failed disk). This is needed
because the replace operation requires the new device to be at least as
big as the old one.
If the answer to either one or two is no but the answer to three is yes,
pull out the failed disk, put in a new one, mount the volume degraded,
and use `btrfs replace` as well (you will need to specify the device ID
for the now missing failed disk, which you can find by calling `btrfs
filesystem show` on the volume). In the event that the replace
operation refuses to run in this case, instead add the new disk to the
volume with `btrfs device add` and then run `btrfs device delete
missing` on the volume.
If you follow any of the above procedures, you don't need to balance
(the replace operation is equivalent to a block level copy and will
result in data being distributed exactly the same as it was before,
while the delete operation is a special type of balance), and you
generally don't need to scrub the volume either (though it may still be
a good idea). As far as getting back from degraded mode, you can just
remount the volume to do so, though I would generally suggest rebooting.
Note that there are three other possible approaches to consider as well:
1. If you can't immediately get a new disk _and_ all the data will fit
on the other two disks, use `btrfs device delete` to remove the failed
disk anyway, and run with just the two until you can get a new disk.
This is exponentially safer than running the volume degraded until you
get a new disk, and is the only case you realistically should delete a
device before adding the new one. Make sure to balance the volume after
adding the new device.
2. Depending on the situation, it may be faster to just recreate the
whole volume from scratch using a backup than it is to try to repair it.
This is actually the absolute safest method of handling this
situation, as it makes sure that nothing from the old volume with the
failed disk causes problems in the future.
3. If you don't have a backup, but have some temporary storage space
that will fit all the data from the volume, you could also use `btrfs
restore` to extract files from the old volume to temporary storage,
recreate the volume, and copy the data back in from the temporary storage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I did a quick scan of the wiki just to see, but I did not find any good
info about how to recover a "RAID" like set if degraded. Information
about how to recover, and what profiles can be recovered from would be
good to have (with examples) in a separate "how-to" on the Wiki.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
