On 2018/03/17 22:23, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On 03/15/2018 09:13 AM, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
>> This is a preparetion work to allow normal user to call
>> "subvolume list/show".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  btrfs-list.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  btrfs-list.h |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/btrfs-list.c b/btrfs-list.c
>> index 50e5ce5f..88689a9d 100644
>> --- a/btrfs-list.c
>> +++ b/btrfs-list.c
>> @@ -958,6 +958,39 @@ out:
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Check the permission for tree search ioctl by searching a key
>> + * which alwasys exists
>> + */
>> +int check_perm_for_tree_search(int fd)
>> +{
> 
> In what this is different from '(getuid() == 0)' ? 
> Which would be the cases where an error different from EPERM would be 
> returned (other than the filesystem is not a BTRFS one )?
> 
> I am not against to this kind of function. However with this implementation 
> is not clear its behavior:
> - does it check if the user has enough privileges to perform a 
> BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH
> or 
> - does it check if BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH might return some error ?
> 
> If the former, I would put this function into utils.[hc] checking only the 
> [e]uid of the user. If the latter the name is confusing...

The reason I wrote this function is that the permission for 
BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH is
CAP_SYS_ADMIN and might not equal uid == 0.

However, it seems that get_euid() is simple and enough for btrfs-progs, so I 
will
use it instead of this function in next version.

Thanks,
Tomohiro Misono

> 
>> +    struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args args;
>> +    struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk = &args.key;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
>> +    sk->tree_id = BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID;
>> +    sk->min_objectid = BTRFS_EXTENT_TREE_OBJECTID;
>> +    sk->max_objectid = BTRFS_EXTENT_TREE_OBJECTID;
>> +    sk->min_type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
>> +    sk->max_type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
>> +    sk->min_offset = 0;
>> +    sk->max_offset = (u64)-1;
>> +    sk->min_transid = 0;
>> +    sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;
>> +    sk->nr_items = 1;
>> +    ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH, &args);
>> +
>> +    if (!ret)
>> +            ret = 1;
>> +    else if (ret < 0 && errno == EPERM)
>> +            ret = 0;
>> +    else
>> +            ret = -errno;
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int list_subvol_search(int fd, struct root_lookup *root_lookup)
>>  {
>>      int ret;
>> diff --git a/btrfs-list.h b/btrfs-list.h
>> index 6e5fc778..6225311d 100644
>> --- a/btrfs-list.h
>> +++ b/btrfs-list.h
>> @@ -176,5 +176,6 @@ char *btrfs_list_path_for_root(int fd, u64 root);
>>  int btrfs_list_get_path_rootid(int fd, u64 *treeid);
>>  int btrfs_get_subvol(int fd, struct root_info *the_ri);
>>  int btrfs_get_toplevel_subvol(int fd, struct root_info *the_ri);
>> +int check_perm_for_tree_search(int fd);
>>  
>>  #endif
>>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to