On 03/27/2018 08:21 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:


On 26.03.2018 11:27, Anand Jain wrote:
During mount context, we aren't verifying the superblock checksum
for all the devices, instead, we verify it only for the
struct btrfs_fs_device::latest_bdev. This patch fixes it
by moving the checksum verification code from the function open_ctree()
into the function btrfs_read_dev_one_super().

By doing this now we are verifying the superblock checksum
in the mount-context, device-replace and, device-delete context.

Which call chain provides the device-replace and device-delete contexts?
I think it is worth it documenting them in the changelog.

 Will copy it here from the cover-letter.


Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>


---
  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 6299ab18da5f..3cc50041c0b9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -2565,24 +2565,6 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
        }
/*
-        * We want to check superblock checksum, the type is stored inside.
-        * Pass the whole disk block of size BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE (4k).
-        */
-       err = btrfs_check_super_csum(bh->b_data);
-       if (err) {
-               if (err == -EINVAL)
-                       pr_err("BTRFS error (device %pg): "\
-                               "unsupported checksum algorithm",
-                               fs_devices->latest_bdev);
-               else
-                       pr_err("BTRFS error (device %pg): "\
-                               "superblock checksum mismatch",
-                               fs_devices->latest_bdev);
-               brelse(bh);
-               goto fail_alloc;
-       }
-
-       /*
         * super_copy is zeroed at allocation time and we never touch the
         * following bytes up to INFO_SIZE, the checksum is calculated from
         * the whole block of INFO_SIZE
@@ -3128,6 +3110,7 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_one_super(struct block_device *bdev, 
int copy_num,
        struct buffer_head *bh;
        struct btrfs_super_block *super;
        u64 bytenr;
+       int err;
bytenr = btrfs_sb_offset(copy_num);
        if (bytenr + BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE >= i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode))
@@ -3148,6 +3131,22 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_one_super(struct block_device *bdev, 
int copy_num,
                return -EINVAL;
        }
+ /*
+        * Check the superblock checksum, the type is stored inside.
+        * Pass the whole disk block of size BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE (4k).
+        */
+       err = btrfs_check_super_csum(bh->b_data);
+       if (err) {

I am fixing this to if (err < 0) {

+               if (err == -EINVAL)
+                       pr_err("BTRFS error (device %pg): unsupported checksum 
algorithm",
+                               bdev);
+               else if (err == -EUCLEAN)
+                       pr_err("BTRFS error (device %pg): superblock checksum 
mismatch",
+                               bdev);

 I am also dropping else if to else in v2.

Thanks, Anand


+               brelse(bh);
+               return err;
+       }
+
        *bh_ret = bh;
        return 0;
  }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to