On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:12:13PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Currently this function handles both the READ and WRITE dio cases. This
> is facilitated by a bunch of 'if' statements, a goto short-circuit
> statement and a very perverse aliasing of "!created"(READ) case
> by setting lockstart = lockend and checking for lockstart < lockend for
> detecting the write. Let's simplify this mess by extracting the
> READ-only code into a separate __btrfs_get_block_direct_read function.
> This is only the first step, the next one will be to factor out the
> write side as well. The end goal will be to have the common locking/
> unlocking code in btrfs_get_blocks_direct and then it will call either
> the read|write subvariants. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>

uh what a convoluted code to untangle. A few style notes below.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 491a7397f6fa..fd99347d0c91 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -7677,6 +7677,27 @@ static struct extent_map *create_io_em(struct inode 
> *inode, u64 start, u64 len,
>       return em;
>  }
>  
> +
> +static int __btrfs_get_blocks_direct_read(struct extent_map *em,

Please drop the "__" the function is static and there's no
underscore-less version.

> +                                      struct buffer_head *bh_result,
> +                                      struct inode *inode,
> +                                      u64 start, u64 len)
> +{
> +     if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_HOLE ||
> +                     test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PREALLOC, &em->flags))
> +             return -ENOENT;
> +
> +     len = min(len, em->len - (start - em->start));
> +
> +     bh_result->b_blocknr = (em->block_start + (start - em->start)) >>
> +             inode->i_blkbits;
> +     bh_result->b_size = len;
> +     bh_result->b_bdev = em->bdev;
> +     set_buffer_mapped(bh_result);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
>                                  struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create)
>  {
> @@ -7745,11 +7766,22 @@ static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struct inode 
> *inode, sector_t iblock,
>               goto unlock_err;
>       }
>  
> -     /* Just a good old fashioned hole, return */
> -     if (!create && (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_HOLE ||
> -                     test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PREALLOC, &em->flags))) {
> +     if (!create) {
> +             ret = __btrfs_get_blocks_direct_read(em, bh_result, inode,
> +                                                start, len);
> +             /* Can be negative only if we read from a hole */
> +             if (ret < 0) {
> +                     ret = 0;
> +                     free_extent_map(em);
> +                     goto unlock_err;
> +             }
> +             /*
> +              * We need to unlock only the end area that we aren't using
> +              * if there is any leftover space
> +              */
> +             free_extent_state(cached_state);
>               free_extent_map(em);
> -             goto unlock_err;
> +             return 0;

Please add a separate label for that, the funcion uses the single exit
block style (labels and one-or-two returns).

>       }
>  
>       /*
> @@ -7761,12 +7793,6 @@ static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struct inode 
> *inode, sector_t iblock,
>        * just use the extent.
>        *
>        */
> -     if (!create) {
> -             len = min(len, em->len - (start - em->start));
> -             lockstart = start + len;
> -             goto unlock;
> -     }
> -
>       if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PREALLOC, &em->flags) ||
>           ((BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) &&
>            em->block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE)) {
> @@ -7853,10 +7879,7 @@ static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struct inode 
> *inode, sector_t iblock,
>               clear_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart,
>                                lockend, unlock_bits, 1, 0,
>                                &cached_state);
> -     } else {
> -             free_extent_state(cached_state);
>       }
> -
>       free_extent_map(em);
>  
>       return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to