On 2018年04月17日 01:27, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:53:10PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
>> On 2018/04/12 22:13, David Sterba wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
>>>> remaining patches.
>>>>
>>>> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get
>>>> obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed
>>>> until inode reserved space is freed.
>>>>
>>>> This would cause a lot of qgroup related test cases to fail.
>>>>
>>>> Would you please merge this patch with all qgroup patchset?
>>>
>>> For the record: patch 9 and 10 are now in misc next and will go to 4.17.
>>> I need to let them through the for-next and other testing, so it will be
>>> some of the post rc1 pull requests.
>>
>> I still saw qgroup related xfstests (btrfs/022 etc.) fails in current 
>> misc-next branch
>> which includes 9th and 10th patches.
>>
>> I noticed 5th patch in the tree (already in v4.17-rc1) is older version and 
>> this
>> seems the reason that the tests still fails.
> 
> Qu, can you please have a look a send an incremental fixup? Handling of
> this patchset was not very good from my side, I should have asked for a
> fresh resend as I applied the changes from mailinglist and not from git.

No problem, and for next time, I'll double check misc-next branch for
such difference.

Thanks,
Qu

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to