On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:28:31PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Adds comments about BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP to existing comments
> about the device locks.

Thanks, a few comments below.

> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 3a3912a9dec9..18306165ffaa 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,22 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *fs_info,
>   *   device_list_mutex
>   *     chunk_mutex
>   *   balance_mutex
> + *
> + * BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP
> + * ----------------
> + * Maintains the exclusivity of the following device operations.
> + *
> + * - Balance (*)
> + * - Add

device add

> + * - Remove

device remove

> + * - Replace (*)

device replace

> + * - Resize
> + *
> + * The device operation with (*) indicate it can continue after a CLI pause
> + * (only balance can be paused using CLI) or remount or unmount-mount 
> sequence
> + * or a power-recycle, as long as the FS is still writeable. And during the

this would be more readable if is' a bullet list like above

> + * course of the pause, the BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP remains set. BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP 
> flag
> + * is set and cleared using atomic functions.

Please rephrase that without the CLI and use 'ioctl' instead, as this
is the interface.

>   */
>  
>  DEFINE_MUTEX(uuid_mutex);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to