Hi Anand, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on btrfs/next] [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc3 next-20180430] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Anand-Jain/btrfs-fix-BUG-trying-to-resume-balance-without-resume-flag/20180430-192532 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next config: i386-randconfig-a1-201817 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=i386 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'btrfs_resume_balance_async': >> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3971:22: error: 'struct btrfs_balance_control' has no >> member named 'b_flags' fs_info->balance_ctl->b_flags |= BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME; ^ vim +3971 fs/btrfs/volumes.c 3954 3955 int btrfs_resume_balance_async(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) 3956 { 3957 struct task_struct *tsk; 3958 3959 spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock); 3960 if (!fs_info->balance_ctl) { 3961 spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock); 3962 return 0; 3963 } 3964 spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock); 3965 3966 if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SKIP_BALANCE)) { 3967 btrfs_info(fs_info, "force skipping balance"); 3968 return 0; 3969 } 3970 > 3971 fs_info->balance_ctl->b_flags |= BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME; 3972 3973 tsk = kthread_run(balance_kthread, fs_info, "btrfs-balance"); 3974 return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(tsk); 3975 } 3976 --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
