On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:56:10AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > --- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h > +++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h > @@ -23,13 +23,12 @@ > #define BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED 1 > #define BTRFS_INODE_DUMMY 2 > #define BTRFS_INODE_IN_DEFRAG 3 > -#define BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM 4 > -#define BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ASYNC_EXTENT 5 > -#define BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC 6 > -#define BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING 7 > -#define BTRFS_INODE_IN_DELALLOC_LIST 8 > -#define BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK 9 > -#define BTRFS_INODE_HAS_PROPS 10 > +#define BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ASYNC_EXTENT 4 > +#define BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC 5 > +#define BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING 6 > +#define BTRFS_INODE_IN_DELALLOC_LIST 7 > +#define BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK 8 > +#define BTRFS_INODE_HAS_PROPS 9
Please keep such changes minimal and only relevant to the purpose of the patch, in this case just remove the BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM . There will be a hole left in the sequence but this is not a problem and we're going to convert the defines to enums. The defines are prone to error if the nubmers get accidentally duplicated, like it happend not so long ago with the fsinfo::fs_flags. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
