On 15.05.2018 20:52, Liu Bo wrote: > In read_block_for_search(), it's straightforward to use > extent_buffer_uptodate() instead since 0 is passed as parent transid to
"instead of the more heavyweight btrfs_buffer_update" > btrfs_buffer_uptodate(), which means the check for parent transid is not > needed. > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo....@linux.alibaba.com> Codewise LGTM: Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > index 9fa3d77c98d4..a96d308c51b8 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > @@ -2445,7 +2445,7 @@ noinline void btrfs_unlock_up_safe(struct btrfs_path > *path, int level) > * and give up so that our caller doesn't loop forever > * on our EAGAINs. > */ > - if (!btrfs_buffer_uptodate(tmp, 0, 0)) > + if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(tmp)) > ret = -EIO; > free_extent_buffer(tmp); > } else { > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html