On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:08:29AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Uh, we're changing function signatures /and/ redefinining vm_fault_t? > All in the same 90K patch? > > I /was/ expecting a series of "convert XXXXX and all callers/users" > patches followed by a trivial one to switch the definition, not a giant > pile of change. FWIW I don't mind so much if you make a patch > containing a change for some super-common primitive and a hojillion > little diff hunks tree-wide, but only one logical change at a time for a > big patch, please... > > I quite prefer seeing the whole series from start to finish all packaged > up in one series, but wow this was overwhelming. :/
Another vote to split the change of the typedef, ok I get the message.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
