On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 09:59:50AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osan...@fb.com>
> 
> btrfs_truncate() uses two variables for error handling, ret and err (if
> this sounds familiar, it's because btrfs_truncate_inode_items() did
> something similar). This is error prone, as was made evident by "Btrfs:
> fix error handling in btrfs_truncate()". We only have err because we
> don't want to mask an error if we call btrfs_update_inode() and
> btrfs_end_transaction(), so let's make that its own scoped return
> variable and use ret everywhere else.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osan...@fb.com>
> ---
> This is the same as my v1 "Btrfs: fix error handling in
> btrfs_truncate()", but rebased on top of kdave/for-next + v2 of "Btrfs:
> fix error handling in btrfs_truncate()".
> 
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Dave, what are your thoughts on this one? Are you thinking 4.18 or 4.19?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to