On 06/07/2018 10:45 AM, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018/05/15 10:33, Su Yue wrote:
>> Define new macro I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS to represents odd inode flags.
>>
>> Symlinks should never have append/immutable flags.
>> While processing inodes, if found a symlink with append/immutable
>> flags, mark the inode record with I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS.
>>
>> This is for original mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  check/main.c          | 7 +++++++
>>  check/mode-original.h | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/check/main.c b/check/main.c
>> index 68da994f7ae0..c764fc011ded 100644
>> --- a/check/main.c
>> +++ b/check/main.c
>> @@ -576,6 +576,8 @@ static void print_inode_error(struct btrfs_root *root, 
>> struct inode_record *rec)
>>              fprintf(stderr, ", link count wrong");
>>      if (errors & I_ERR_FILE_EXTENT_ORPHAN)
>>              fprintf(stderr, ", orphan file extent");
>> +    if (errors & I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS)
>> +            fprintf(stderr, ", odd inode flags");
>>      fprintf(stderr, "\n");
>>      /* Print the orphan extents if needed */
>>      if (errors & I_ERR_FILE_EXTENT_ORPHAN)
>> @@ -805,6 +807,7 @@ static int process_inode_item(struct extent_buffer *eb,
>>  {
>>      struct inode_record *rec;
>>      struct btrfs_inode_item *item;
>> +    u64 flags;
>>  
>>      rec = active_node->current;
>>      BUG_ON(rec->ino != key->objectid || rec->refs > 1);
>> @@ -822,6 +825,10 @@ static int process_inode_item(struct extent_buffer *eb,
>>      rec->found_inode_item = 1;
>>      if (rec->nlink == 0)
>>              rec->errors |= I_ERR_NO_ORPHAN_ITEM;
>> +    flags = btrfs_inode_flags(eb, item);
>> +    if (rec->imode & BTRFS_FT_SYMLINK &&
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I observed that this commit causes test-convert/009 in current kdave/devel 
> branch.
> Since rec->imode uses S_IFLNK (0xa000) for symbolic link and BTRFS_FT_SYMLINK 
> is 7,
> above statement does not work well. Shouldn't we use S_ISLNK(rec->imode) 
> instead?
> 

Oh.. Yep, my bad.
Since the test case is created by hand, the whole patchset should be
modified in next version.
Thanks a lot.

Su

> Thanks,
> Tomohiro Misono
> 
>> +        flags & (BTRFS_INODE_IMMUTABLE | BTRFS_INODE_APPEND))
>> +            rec->errors |= I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS;
>>      maybe_free_inode_rec(&active_node->inode_cache, rec);
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/check/mode-original.h b/check/mode-original.h
>> index 368de692fdd1..13cfa5b9e1b3 100644
>> --- a/check/mode-original.h
>> +++ b/check/mode-original.h
>> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ struct file_extent_hole {
>>  #define I_ERR_LINK_COUNT_WRONG              (1 << 13)
>>  #define I_ERR_FILE_EXTENT_ORPHAN    (1 << 14)
>>  #define I_ERR_FILE_EXTENT_TOO_LARGE (1 << 15)
>> +#define I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS               (1 << 16)
>>  
>>  struct inode_record {
>>      struct list_head backrefs;
>>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to