On 21.06.2018 05:05, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018年06月20日 20:49, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> It can be referenced from trans since the function is always called
>> within a transaction
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 10 ++++------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> index c3c3e6f3b72c..9c0e15b057a0 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> @@ -1038,10 +1038,10 @@ int btrfs_lookup_extent_info(struct 
>> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  
>>  #ifdef BTRFS_COMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V0
> 
> Do we really need to update this code?
> 
> V0 extent tree is already deprecated, maybe it's a good time to remove
> them now?

I did it for the sake of consistency. David said in the past that
actually removing the v0 code might be what we want to do. I don't have
strong preferences either way.

> 
> Thanks,
> Qu
> 
>>  static int convert_extent_item_v0(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> -                              struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>                                struct btrfs_path *path,
>>                                u64 owner, u32 extra_size)
>>  {
>> +    struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
>>      struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->extent_root;
>>      struct btrfs_extent_item *item;
>>      struct btrfs_extent_item_v0 *ei0;
>> @@ -1682,8 +1682,7 @@ int lookup_inline_extent_backref(struct 
>> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>                      err = -ENOENT;
>>                      goto out;
>>              }
>> -            ret = convert_extent_item_v0(trans, fs_info, path, owner,
>> -                                         extra_size);
>> +            ret = convert_extent_item_v0(trans, path, owner, extra_size);
>>              if (ret < 0) {
>>                      err = ret;
>>                      goto out;
>> @@ -2384,7 +2383,7 @@ static int run_delayed_extent_op(struct 
>> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>      item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, path->slots[0]);
>>  #ifdef BTRFS_COMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V0
>>      if (item_size < sizeof(*ei)) {
>> -            ret = convert_extent_item_v0(trans, fs_info, path, (u64)-1, 0);
>> +            ret = convert_extent_item_v0(trans, path, (u64)-1, 0);
>>              if (ret < 0) {
>>                      err = ret;
>>                      goto out;
>> @@ -6937,8 +6936,7 @@ static int __btrfs_free_extent(struct 
>> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  #ifdef BTRFS_COMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V0
>>      if (item_size < sizeof(*ei)) {
>>              BUG_ON(found_extent || extent_slot != path->slots[0]);
>> -            ret = convert_extent_item_v0(trans, info, path, owner_objectid,
>> -                                         0);
>> +            ret = convert_extent_item_v0(trans, path, owner_objectid, 0);
>>              if (ret < 0) {
>>                      btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
>>                      goto out;
>>
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to