> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 at 11:26 PM
> From: "Hans van Kranenburg" <hans.van.kranenb...@mendix.com>
> To: "Nikolay Borisov" <nbori...@suse.com>, "Su Yue"
> <suy.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Add more details while checking tree block
>
> On 06/22/2018 01:48 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 22.06.2018 04:52, Su Yue wrote:
> >> For easier debug, print eb->start if level is invalid.
> >> Also make print clear if bytenr found is not expected.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 8 ++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> >> index c3504b4d281b..a90dab84f41b 100644
> >> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> >> @@ -615,8 +615,8 @@ static int btree_readpage_end_io_hook(struct
> >> btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
> >>
> >> found_start = btrfs_header_bytenr(eb);
> >> if (found_start != eb->start) {
> >> - btrfs_err_rl(fs_info, "bad tree block start %llu %llu",
> >> - found_start, eb->start);
> >> + btrfs_err_rl(fs_info, "bad tree block start want %llu have
> >> %llu",
> >
> > nit: I'd rather have the want/have in brackets (want %llu have% llu)
>
> From a user support point of view, this text should really be improved.
> There are a few places where 'want' and 'have' are reported in error
> strings, and it's totally unclear what they mean.
>
Yes. The strings are too concise for users to understand errors.
Developers always prefer to avoid "unnecessary" words in logs.
> Intuitively I'd say when checking a csum, the "want" would be what's on
> disk now, since you want that to be correct, and the "have" would be
> what you have calculated, but it's actually the other way round, or
> wasn't it? Or was it?
For csum, you are right at all.
In this situation, IIRC bytenr of "have" is read from disk.
Bytenr of "want" is assigned while constructing eb, from parent ptr
, root item and other things which are also read from disk.
>
> Every time someone pastes such a message when we help on IRC for
> example, there's confusion, and I have to look up the source again,
> because I always forget.
Me too.
>
> What about (%llu stored on disk, %llu calculated now) or something similar?
>
"(%llu stored on disk " part sounds good to me. But I don't know how to
describe the second part. May the good sleep help me.
Thanks,
Su
> >
> >> + eb->start, found_start);
> >> ret = -EIO;
> >> goto err;
> >> }
> >> @@ -628,8 +628,8 @@ static int btree_readpage_end_io_hook(struct
> >> btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
> >> }
> >> found_level = btrfs_header_level(eb);
> >> if (found_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
> >> - btrfs_err(fs_info, "bad tree block level %d",
> >> - (int)btrfs_header_level(eb));
> >> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "bad tree block level %d on %llu",
> >> + (int)btrfs_header_level(eb), eb->start);
> >> ret = -EIO;
> >> goto err;
> >> }
> >>
>
> --
> Hans van Kranenburg
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
