On  3.07.2018 08:14, Anand Jain wrote:
> There is only one usage of the declared devices variable, instead
> use its value directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index f7fa0ea26e9c..124bd8728c37 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -2406,7 +2406,6 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *fs_info, const char *device_path
>       struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
>       struct btrfs_device *device;
>       struct block_device *bdev;
> -     struct list_head *devices;
>       struct super_block *sb = fs_info->sb;
>       struct rcu_string *name;
>       struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices;
> @@ -2431,10 +2430,8 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *fs_info, const char *device_path
>  
>       filemap_write_and_wait(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping);
>  
> -     devices = &fs_devices->devices;
> -
>       mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> -     list_for_each_entry(device, devices, dev_list) {
> +     list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
>               if (device->bdev == bdev) {
>                       ret = -EEXIST;
>                       mutex_unlock(
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to