> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qu Wenruo [mailto:quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 5:41 PM
> To: Gu, Jinxiang/顾 金香 <g...@cn.fujitsu.com>; Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>; 
> linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] btrfs-progs: check: Remove the ability to rebuild 
> root overwritting existing tree blocks
> 
> 
> 
> On 2018年07月05日 16:50, Gu, Jinxiang wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
> >> [mailto:linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Qu Wenruo
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 3:37 PM
> >> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] btrfs-progs: check: Remove the ability to rebuild 
> >> root overwritting existing tree blocks
> >>
> >> We have function btrfs_fsck_reinit_root() to reinit csum or extent tree.
> >
> > Nit:
> > or fs/file tree
> 
> Nope, btrfs check is only capable of reinit csum or extent tree.
Sorry, not fs/file tree. But DATA RELOC TREE.
Call stack is reset_balance -> btrfs_fsck_reinit_root, and the root is get by
btrfs_read_fs_root(fs_info, &key), which key is
(BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID, BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY , (u64)-1)

> 
> Thanks,
> Qu
> 
> >
> >> However this function allows us to let it overwrite existing tree blocks
> >> using @overwrite parameter.
> >>
> >> Such behavior is pretty dangerous while no caller is using this feature
> >> explicitly.
> >>
> >> So just remove @overwrite parameter and allow btrfs_fsck_reinit_root()
> >> to error out when it fails to allocate tree block.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
> >> ---
> >>  check/main.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/check/main.c b/check/main.c
> >> index 8db300abb825..c8c347236543 100644
> >> --- a/check/main.c
> >> +++ b/check/main.c
> >> @@ -8379,7 +8379,7 @@ static int do_check_chunks_and_extents(struct 
> >> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static int btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >> -                     struct btrfs_root *root, int overwrite)
> >> +                            struct btrfs_root *root)
> >>  {
> >>    struct extent_buffer *c;
> >>    struct extent_buffer *old = root->node;
> >> @@ -8389,21 +8389,13 @@ static int btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(struct 
> >> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >>
> >>    level = 0;
> >>
> >> -  if (overwrite) {
> >> -          c = old;
> >> -          extent_buffer_get(c);
> >> -          goto init;
> >> -  }
> >>    c = btrfs_alloc_free_block(trans, root,
> >>                               root->fs_info->nodesize,
> >>                               root->root_key.objectid,
> >>                               &disk_key, level, 0, 0);
> >> -  if (IS_ERR(c)) {
> >> -          c = old;
> >> -          extent_buffer_get(c);
> >> -          overwrite = 1;
> >> -  }
> >> -init:
> >> +  if (IS_ERR(c))
> >> +          return PTR_ERR(c);
> >> +
> >>    memset_extent_buffer(c, 0, 0, sizeof(struct btrfs_header));
> >>    btrfs_set_header_level(c, level);
> >>    btrfs_set_header_bytenr(c, c->start);
> >> @@ -8422,9 +8414,7 @@ init:
> >>    /*
> >>     * this case can happen in the following case:
> >>     *
> >> -   * 1.overwrite previous root.
> >> -   *
> >> -   * 2.reinit reloc data root, this is because we skip pin
> >> +   * reinit reloc data root, this is because we skip pin
> >>     * down reloc data tree before which means we can allocate
> >>     * same block bytenr here.
> >>     */
> >> @@ -8609,7 +8599,7 @@ reinit_data_reloc:
> >>            goto out;
> >>    }
> >>    record_root_in_trans(trans, root);
> >> -  ret = btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(trans, root, 0);
> >> +  ret = btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(trans, root);
> >>    if (ret)
> >>            goto out;
> >>    ret = btrfs_make_root_dir(trans, root, BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID);
> >> @@ -8675,7 +8665,7 @@ again:
> >>    }
> >>
> >>    /* Ok we can allocate now, reinit the extent root */
> >> -  ret = btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(trans, fs_info->extent_root, 0);
> >> +  ret = btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(trans, fs_info->extent_root);
> >>    if (ret) {
> >>            fprintf(stderr, "extent root initialization failed\n");
> >>            /*
> >> @@ -9764,7 +9754,7 @@ int cmd_check(int argc, char **argv)
> >>
> >>            if (init_csum_tree) {
> >>                    printf("Reinitialize checksum tree\n");
> >> -                  ret = btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(trans, info->csum_root, 0);
> >> +                  ret = btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(trans, info->csum_root);
> >>                    if (ret) {
> >>                            error("checksum tree initialization failed: %d",
> >>                                            ret);
> >> --
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Gu Jinxiang <g...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >
> >
> >> 2.18.0
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > N嫥叉靣笡y氊b瞂千v豝�)藓{.n�+壏{眓谶�)韰骅w*jg�秹殠娸/侁鋤罐枈�2娹櫒璀�&�)摺玜囤瓽珴閔�鎗:+v墾
> 妛鑶佶
> >



Reply via email to