On 16.07.2018 12:11, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> fs_devices is always passed to btrfs_scan_one_device which
> overrides it. And in the call stack below fs_devices is passed to
> btrfs_scan_one_device from btrfs_mount_root.
> And in btrfs_mount_root the output fs_devices of this call stack
> is not used.
> btrfs_mount_root
>         -> btrfs_parse_early_options
>                 ->btrfs_scan_one_device
> So, there is no necessary to pass fs_devices from btrfs_mount_root,
> use a local variable in btrfs_parse_early_options is enough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <g...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
> ---
> 
> Changelog:
> v5: change a line wrap, and rebase to misc-next.
> v4: changed a line warp, and adjusted the order of two rows.
> v3: rebase to misc-next.
> v2: deal with Nikolay's comment, make changelog more clair.
> 
>  fs/btrfs/super.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index 28ab75ebb983..dcab4a0244e5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -884,10 +884,11 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, 
> char *options,
>   * only when we need to allocate a new super block.
>   */
>  static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
> -             void *holder, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices)
> +                                     void *holder)
>  {
>       substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
>       char *device_name, *opts, *orig, *p;
> +     struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
>       int error = 0;
>  
>       lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
> @@ -917,8 +918,8 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, 
> fmode_t flags,
>                               error = -ENOMEM;
>                               goto out;
>                       }
> -                     error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name,
> -                                     flags, holder, fs_devices);
> +                     error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
> +                                                     holder, &fs_devices);

You are line wraps are in fact worse than before, the first letter of
the "holder.." line has to be aligned exactly under the first letter of
"device_name". I assume David will fix this while merging so no need to
resend but fix your editor for future submissions.

>                       kfree(device_name);
>                       if (error)
>                               goto out;
> @@ -1554,7 +1555,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct 
> file_system_type *fs_type,
>       }
>  
>       mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> -     error = btrfs_parse_early_options(data, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
> +     error = btrfs_parse_early_options(data, mode, fs_type);
>       if (error) {
>               mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
>               goto error_fs_info;
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to