On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:58:12PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Move the section of the code which performs the check if the device is
> indelible, move that into a helper function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: Rename function to btrfs_get_device_for_delete(), thanks
> Nikolay.
> 
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 1c0b56374992..0cefc24b028c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1859,6 +1859,33 @@ static inline u64 btrfs_num_devices(struct 
> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>       return num_devices;
>  }
>  
> +static struct btrfs_device *btrfs_get_device_for_delete(
> +                             struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> +                             const char *device_path, u64 devid)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +     struct btrfs_device *device;
> +
> +     ret = btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(fs_info,
> +                                        btrfs_num_devices(fs_info) - 1);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +     ret = btrfs_find_device_by_devspec(fs_info, devid, device_path,
> +                                        &device);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +     if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state))
> +             return ERR_PTR(BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_TGT_REPLACE);

This is wrong, the BTRFS_ERROR valueas are >= 1, but the IS_ERR, ERR_PTR
work for errno values -4095..0 .

Thouth ERR_PTR would cast the integer into pointer, the callers of
btrfs_get_device_for_delete will not detect the error and continue.

> +
> +     if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state) &&
> +         fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices == 1)
> +             return ERR_PTR(BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_ONLY_WRITABLE);
> +
> +     return device;
> +}
> +
>  int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path,
>               u64 devid)
>  {
> @@ -1872,25 +1899,9 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, 
> const char *device_path,
>  
>       mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
>  
> -     num_devices = btrfs_num_devices(fs_info);
> -
> -     ret = btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(fs_info, num_devices - 1);
> -     if (ret)
> -             goto out;
> -
> -     ret = btrfs_find_device_by_devspec(fs_info, devid, device_path,
> -                                        &device);
> -     if (ret)
> -             goto out;
> -
> -     if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state)) {
> -             ret = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_TGT_REPLACE;
> -             goto out;
> -     }
> -
> -     if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state) &&
> -         fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices == 1) {
> -             ret = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_ONLY_WRITABLE;
> +     device = btrfs_get_device_for_delete(fs_info, device_path, devid);
> +     if (IS_ERR(device)) {

BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_ONLY_WRITABLE won't work here.

> +             ret = PTR_ERR(device);
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to